Three services are measured consistently enough across municipalities to compare: electricity for lighting, weekly refuse removal, and a flush toilet connected to public sewerage. Together they give a reasonable picture of basic household service delivery.

Lowest electricity access

Municipality Province Electricity for lighting Formal dwellings
Emadlangeni KwaZulu-Natal 72.1% 81.7%
Umhlabuyalingana KwaZulu-Natal 80.3% 90.0%
Bela Bela Limpopo 83.5% 88.7%
Emalahleni (MP) Mpumalanga 84.1% 88.0%
Matatiele Eastern Cape 84.5% 75.8%
Phumelela Free State 84.8% 82.9%
Kareeberg Northern Cape 86.4% 85.2%
Thembelihle Northern Cape 86.8% 68.1%
Ga-Segonyana Northern Cape 87.0% 89.9%
Thaba Chweu Mpumalanga 87.0% 83.1%
Msukaligwa Mpumalanga 87.2% 84.5%
Cederberg Western Cape 87.3% 75.1%

Lowest refuse removal

Weekly refuse removal is largely an urban service. In deeply rural municipalities the figure is low because households dispose of waste themselves, not necessarily because a promised service has failed.

Municipality Province Weekly refuse removal Piped water inside
Msinga KwaZulu-Natal 11.7% 12.6%
Impendle KwaZulu-Natal 11.8% 18.1%
Joe Morolong Northern Cape 14.6% 18.0%
Nongoma KwaZulu-Natal 14.9% 20.1%
Collins Chabane Limpopo 15.0% 18.8%
Maphumulo KwaZulu-Natal 15.0% 17.9%
Umzumbe KwaZulu-Natal 15.5% 21.0%
Mkhambathini KwaZulu-Natal 15.7% 23.8%
Winnie Madikizela-Mandela Eastern Cape 16.0% 15.8%
Nkandla KwaZulu-Natal 16.2% 17.8%
Makhuduthamaga Limpopo 16.4% 18.9%
Ndwedwe KwaZulu-Natal 17.2% 21.9%

Reading these figures

Census figures describe households, not municipal performance directly. A municipality with dispersed rural settlement faces a genuinely harder task than a compact town. The figures are most meaningful compared between similar municipalities, and alongside the financial measures that show whether the money exists to close the gap.

Figures on this page come from National Treasury, Statistics South Africa and the Auditor-General, as set out in the sources and methodology. Read the methodology